Thursday 29 January 2015

What I love about the AMC's The Walking Dead



I started reading the books long before the TV Show was even given a pilot episode.
The first book that I bought out of Waterstones Book Store probably around ten years ago now, blew me away.  
I couldn't put it down.  Read the entire book in one go, then read it all over again! 

I've been a huge fan of Dawn of the Dead (the original one of course) and Romero's Night of the Living Dead.
It's something about the concept of zombies suddenly being a thing.  Trying to imagine my perfect survival plan should the dead ever walk the Earth.
It's something most if not all fans of the Zombie genre have likely thought about and discussed with friends during a drunken hazy debate.  
The kind of debates that would often turn into arguments or heavy debates, the more inebriated you would become!

It's also been a conversation I've had at work with my colleagues as well.  That perfect Zombie Survival plan.

My plan has always been a rather straightforward one.  Get a mode of transport.  Grab what supplies you can (food, water, etc) and get away from where people are. 
Using a selection of items for weapons from baseball bats, golf clubs or hammers, as, lets face it.  I'm from Scotland and unlike in the United States, guns aren't as easy to come by over here.  And I would never trust myself to accurately hit the side of a bus, nevermind a Walkers head, while in that situation. 
And being from Scotland i'm fortunate.  Because unless everyone shares my plan, the Highlands should be pretty sparse of humans, which would mean there should be far fewer zombies stumbling around. 

Of course, if the zombie Apocalypse should happen, it may be difficult to distinguish against zombies and people who have had a few too many to drink on Perth's High Street on a Saturday or Friday night!

But to the subject at hand.  The things I feel that make the Walking Dead a brilliant show.  
Please keep in mind that I'm talking about the TV Show, not the books here.

As i've said at the start of this article, i've loved the zombie genre for years.  So when a TV Show came out, with the zombie Apocalypse as its storyline, where the story continues and we see how the new, darker, world affects the characters, i was simply over the moon.

The first episode, with Rick Grimes, waking up from a coma at his Hospital, learning how the world has changed.  The mere fact that the viewers were taken on Rick's journey.  Absolutely loved that.  
And like many, I was also upset when (spoiler alert if you haven't seen it yet) Rick's Horse got chomped down on by the Walkers in Atlanta. (I'm an animal lover).

Andrew Lincoln as Rick Grimes


Andrew Lincoln, who plays Rick Grimes, has been amazing in the TV show.  
From the fact that he's a British actor who does a really good American accent, to how he has portrayed Rick over the course of the seasons.  Showing us how Rick Grimes has become darker and darker, in order to ensure the survival of his kids and his group during the Zombie Apocalypse.

Another important key feature with the Walking Dead, is that no character is safe. 
There have been several moments where characters have been killed off and its given me a nasty shock.
For instance, the death of Dale in Season Two or Beth in the current season.  Even Hershel's exit from the show was a major "Holy S**T!" moment.

Most of the characters all gel together, although some i prefer more now than i did in the first couple seasons of the show (Carl and Carol anyone?).  Even Daryl I wasn't too fond of in Season One.  But from Season Two onwards, Daryl Dixon has become one of the strongest characters on the show.  And often a character who incites a great number of confused emotions, while watching the actor, Norman Reedus, portray Daryl.

The fact that in the Walking Dead TV Show, there are characters who aren't in the books, like Daryl and his brother Merle or Bob, it gives the show more of an edge.
This edge is important for the viewers who also read the books, as we know to expect certain things.  For instance the death of Shane or the Governor taking the prison from our heroes. 

The state of humanity. 
This is an important feature in a show like this to make it more realistic.  Seemingly normal people, thrown into a hellish existence where any day can be your last day.  
These characters have to change in order to survive this world.  
In the first season we saw how the characters still tried to hold onto the belief that the Dead returning to life was just a temporary thing.  But as the seasons progressed you saw the characters taking drastic measures to ensure they each survive.
From moments where Rick tore a "Claimers" throat out with his teeth in order to protect his son.  To the group dealing with Cannibals in Season Five (Tainted Meat).

It's the evolution of the characters that keeps me intrigued and ensures I watch every new episode as soon as i can.  The characters with the greatest changes in personality and behaviour are certainly, Rick, Carol, Carl and Daryl in my opinion.



The love issue.  The problem with most network tv shows is that they often get bogged down when it comes to the concept of love and couples getting together.
The Walking Dead doesn't do this.  We have the young couple, Maggie and Glenn, who have been together since Season Two, but the show is never bogged down and held back by this.
There is no lovey dovey angst, no love triangles, no romance drama's where character state that they love each other then think up as many reasons as possible to drag it out until it just gets boring (Like Smallville, Arrow and pretty much almost every other TV show out there)!

And of course there is the behind the scene's shenanigans that we hear about on Youtube, including a prank played on Norman Reedus;

 

This all being said, don't get me wrong.  The TV show has its faults.
Season Two was difficult to get through, as was the second half of Season Four.  And everyone laughs at the magically teleporting Walkers that sometimes appear out of nowhere!

But then no TV Show is perfect.  Every big show from Breaking Bad to Game of Thrones has its faults.  Just like life, there are good moments and bad moments, however that doesn't stop us following our favourite TV Show characters each week, does it?



The Walking Dead returns February 8th for the United States and Canada.  And February 9th for the United Kingdom.

Thanks for reading and let me know your thoughts below.  
Do you have a zombie survival plan figured out?  Who are your favourite Walking Dead characters?  What did you think the highest or lowest point of the TV show is/was?

Political Correctness gone Mad?

There has always been a degree of heated debate among the many "fandoms" whenever a new movie or TV Show project is announced.
Especially when actors/actresses are selected and the information is released to the public.
Generally this always creates some form of a tidal wave among the various Internet Communities.  Often causing "civil wars" and splitting fandom's in half. 

Previous instances of this were centered around Heath Ledger being selected to play the Joker and then Anne Hathaway selected for Selina Kyle / Catwoman.  Which were proven to be unfounded.
I personally thought that Heath Ledger nailed it as the Joker and really enjoyed Anne Hathaways version of Catwoman (Although the Dark Knight Rises was not without its faults)

However more recently, we're seeing casting choices for the Supergirl TV show, the Suicide Squad movie, the Fantastic Four movie, to name but a few.

Lets take a look at some of these, shall we?


The Fantastic Four


I was never too keen on the concept of the new Fantastic Four, not only just because of Michael B. Jordan being selected to play Johnny Storm (although I do believe the issue of changing the races of characters is just Political Correctness gone mad), from watching the trailer, it barely even felt like a Superhero movie.  I personally thought that the F4 cast looked far too young (especially Reed Richards) and overall the trailer left me feeling somewhat underwhelmed. 
I could be wrong about this movie (and i hope i am) but I don't think it'll be an overly big hit, especially in comparison with upcoming movies, Avengers: Age of Ultron and Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice.

Feel free to check out the trailer below if you haven't yet seen it!





Supergirl


Melissa Benoist


The upcoming CBS tv show is a bit of an iffy one for me.
Personally I'd love to see another DC Comics TV show on the air.  Especially after the success of the CW's Arrow and The Flash.
But it seems that severe Internet backlash is ongoing in relation to Mehcad Brooks being selected to portray Comic Book favourite, James Olson. 
From browsing forums across the internet and comment sections on Facebook, the main consensus (yet again) is Political Correctness gone insane.  Which really is seeming to be a popular theme among big named projects at the moment.
I'm sure that Mehcad Brooks is a very accomplished actor, but my question is, why change the race of yet another character at all?  
And we know that the Olsen character is no stranger to odd changes, such as the sudden change of gender from James/Jimmy Olsen to Jenny Olsen in Man of Steel
But then, further controversy has arisen due to who they've selected to play the Maiden of Might, actress Melissa Benoist (best known for her role on Glee).
Personally I don't know very much about Melissa's acting talent as I haven't seen any of her performances.  So i won't be giving any comment on her skills as an actress.
However, back to browsing various internet forums and facebook comment sections, I found several people discussing that with a simple Google search, nude pictures of Melissa Benoist can easily be found.  Some of them portraying her in various acts of sex.
I won't post the links here (for obvious reasons) but the fact that the actress is playing such an iconic DC Comics character, could this possibly be damaging to how people would possibly perceive her performance as Superman's cousin?

My main issue with changing races of iconic characters has always been, why change anything?
If you want more diverse characters to appear in movies and TV Shows, why not simply create new ones?
How hard can it really be?  They are paid to do their jobs, so go, do them!  Give us new heroes and villains if they want everything to be more diverse.

Considering the amount the writers and producers get paid to work on these projects (lets face it, i doubt they'll be going hungry, struggling to pay their bills or being forced to use food banks), instead of constantly rehashing everything and changing it up, create some Originality!!

Today's movie and television industry is fast becoming starved for some real originality and new content, with this age of remakes, reboots, sequels and prequels. 
And let it be said, i am all for more diverse characters appearing on both the big screen and small screen.  I just wonder if these networks get a kick out of p**sing off the fanbases. 

Now to a real top controversy at the moment, which oddly enough has done something of the opposite of the previous two named projects. 
They haven't changed races of any characters, sure, its an all female cast (you know where this is going now, don't you?) but the genders of the original characters don't appear to have been changed.
Yet virtually everyone i know hates the idea of this one!

Ghostbusters (2016) 



Announced Ghostbusters cast


Recently it was announced that Paul Feig has decided on who the all female cast will be.

Melissa McCarthy  Kristen Wiig  Kate McKinnon and Leslie Jones 

Now before i get into this, i just want to say that i have nothing at all against an all female cast.  As long as the actresses involved are good at, you know.. actually acting!!!
But they plan to do this to Ghostbusters?  Really?  REALLY? *takes a deep sigh and sips some tea*

I was at a loss for words when this was first announced.
The only actress from the project that i am familiar with is McCarthy and i'm sorry, but i think she's a terrible actress. 
She's not funny in the slightest and generally comes off as annoying loud mouth.  What is Paul Feig even thinking with this?  
All across the Internet i've seen immense fan back lash and have even witnessed a petition calling for the Ghostbusters reboot to be stopped cold in its tracks. 
Generally though, i do feel there are more important issues in the world to focus a petition on rather than a movie (poverty, war, hunger, corruption etc). 
The facts as i understand them, are that the movie is to be set in New York City, it will be a complete reboot, not a continuation on from the original movies and it seems unlikely to even have a possible cameo appearance from any of the original cast.

I can already imagine how this is going to go, we'll have McCarthy mouthing off every chance she gets while trying her best to actually act.  
The four Ghostbusters will end up divided by around the middle of the movie then right at the end, they'll all come together and save the day then end up being the bestest of friends ever!   While the city celebrates and some horrible song plays leading into the sunset (don't hold your breath on the original Ghostbusters theme being used).

As a child i grew up with the original movies and the first cartoon show and i admit there is currently nothing substantial released about the reboot, i think this is going to be a total and complete flop.
Which is sad, as it may mean it will be a very very long time before we hear anything else about the Ghostbusters franchise again.  

I've said my opinion.
Now you tell me yours in the comments!

Thanks for reading